|
Half-way
through Aks there is an arresting portraiture-level
visual of Manoj Bajpai meditating in a cave behind a
cascading waterfall, before taking on the might of the
burly Bachchan.
After
viewing Aks, I too underwent a similar experience. Only
I meditated over the film's profound yet only-intermittently-communicated
message over a cup of tea in a quiet corner of an overcrowded
Udipi restaurant.
Interpretations
about the film's deeper meaning took birth and died
while I absent-mindedly sipped tea. What stayed in mind
were the film's images. Vivid. Visually stimulating.
Visceral.
Rakesh
Mehra's Aks is the cinema of the image - Manoj Bajpai
racing through the forest hunting a wolf, a blade flashing
in a cave or a climax set against dark grey skies and
sinister-looking rocks of a surreal, never never world.
Mehra's Aks fits right into a world where the 'image'
is fast challenging the 'word' as the prime medium of
communication.
The
film's first half plays like a thriller that seeks to
rock your socks but where alas your interest is kept
alive more by the fascinatingly-shot skein of visuals,
than by the plot. Amitabh Bachchan plays Manu, a security
chief (his aptness for the role is sought to be underlined
by a character who emphasizes that he is looking fit).
Amitabh
is supervising the security for an Indian minister (Amol
Palekar resurrected) on a diplomatic visit to picturesque
Budapest.
This
gives the director an opportunity to frame shots encompassing
the architectural glories of the erstwhile Austro-Hungarian
empire but doesn't give Amitabh an opportunity to prove
his worth. The minister gets a bullet through his head
and an ubiquitous floppy goes missing. Amitabh launches
a mission to find the killer who is leaving a cheeky
signature after each new killing.
Back
in India, Amitabh learns without much ado that the impudent
killer is Raghavan (Manoj Bajpai), a societal reject
who has a twisted take on the Geeta's 'Na Koi Maarta
hai; na koi marta hai' which he uses to justify his
remorseless killings. A psychotic creature with a manic
panic laugh, he has a primeval relationship with club
dancer Nita (Raveena Tandon). Amitabh, however, hooks
him, he is thrown into jail, the judge throws the book
at him and Manoj is hanged.
But
Manoj's 'na koi marta hai' catchline comes back to haunt
Amitabh when he finds that his own body is now playing
host to Manoj's spirit and is being used to further
Manoj's dense deceits and desires. Brrr. Now Amitabh
is a danger to his own wife (Nandita Das) and young
daughter.
The
metaphysical climax suggests that evil can only be transposed
or controlled, not eradicated. There's always a new
candidate to house it.
Aks
has an interesting premise - it uses Amitabh as the
symbol of good, Manoj Bajpai as embelemetic of evil.
It puts them both in the same body and tries to say
that every body is the battleground between good and
evil.
But
the film runs the very real danger of being seen as
just a superior supernatural thriller. Because unfortunately
the film's too vague and open to interpretation. Worse,
it's not entirely convincing. It's too indistinct whether
the evil was already within Amitabh or if it was Manoj's
proximity that gave birth to it. Also the fact that
Amitabh is seen to vanquish the evil within him finally,
seems to be in variance to the film's belief that good
and evil co-exist as mirror images.
Opaque
it may be, but the film has compensations. After years,
Amitabh gets a meaty role befiting his metier. He chews
on it with cannibalistic relish getting right down to
Manu Verma's bare bones. Watch him in the scene where
he clings to Nandita begging for help revealing taht
he's scared. Personally, I think he enjoyed playing
the evil self even more; maybe I enjoyed watching that
more.
Manoj
Bajpai wears the role a closely as one of his character's
masks. He brings an elemental earthy quality to his
role. And his balletic hand gestures might seem an embarrassment
on another actor - but Manoj carries it off.
Raveena's
dances have an erotic charge and her amoral character
is a refreshing change for the actress but Nandita Das'
role as a dutiful wife has in-built drawbacks. In the
first half her character's peripheral; in the second
crucial but conventional. Nandita however has an extremely
endearing screen presence. And to her credit, she resists
melodrama, a temptation that lies deceptively concealed
in such a role like landmines in a battlefield.
Finally,
Aks' grasp may be higher than its reach but it does
serve up some food for thought. At least it attempts
to push the envelope in terms of form, content and message.
|