|
A
Tribute to RK Narayan
Unlike
other fellow writers, he did not prefer to be distinguished
himself as a social reformer or a precursor and much less
a foreordainer. Nor was he be able to comment on the current
literary trends of the world. Yet, his name is held in all
reverence by a long list of littérateurs -- Graham
Greene, John Updike, VS Naipaul, Mulk Raj Anand, Ved Mehta,
Salman Rushdie, Norman Sherry, William Walsh, Vikram Seth,
Arundhati Roy, Andrew Graham Yooll, etc. His works have been
translated into 14 languages including Russian, Japanese and
Hebrew and are read world over. Some of which have been made
into films too.
The prestigious Brown University in US has nearly become a
sort of literary private collection of Clinton plenipotentiary
to most of his papers. Besides, American academic institutions
like Mugar Memorial Librarys Special Collection
at Boston University; the Smullyan, New York; the Harry Ransom
Humanities Research Centre at the University of Texas, Austin;
and the John J. Burns at Boston College, owns substantial
materials on him.
Awards
such as Padma Bhusan, AC Banson Medal of the Royal Society
of Literature, the English Speaking Unions are among
other honours that were bestowed on him. However, with the
passage of time, fellowships from the Sahitya Akademi, American
Academy and Institute of Arts and Letters came his way.
Rasipuram
Krishnaswamy Iyer Narayanswamy (Graham Greene had curtailed
the 37-letter-name into RK Narayan!) is not unfamiliar to
the Indian readers. As he passed away recently, it is worth
recalling his absorbing life--crests and troughs, of a master
storyteller who was arguably the finest Anglo--Indian novelist
of the 20th century.
RK
Narayan was born on October 10, 1906 at Chennapatna, a typical
sleepy little town of Mysore. One of the distinguished traits
of the Narayan family was his strict disciplinarian, conservative
and absurdly opinionated father RV Krishnaswamy Iyer, who
was the headmaster. The one of the story that made enough
rounds, regarding his scrupulousness, was that he used to
cane the young teachers if they came late to school.
At home, however, he demostrated quite differently. He hardly
imposed any strictures on his four sons, especially in the
choice of subjects either in school or college. Like Tagores
father, he too refused to believe in the Indian education
system. The same can be said about Nirad C. Chaudhuri, who
rather aired his contempt on the education system per se and
didn't send any of his three sons to school.
Of all one good thing which has come forth of his being the
headmaster, was that his children had unlimited access to
dabble with books and journals that the library used to subscribe
and although his talented uncle TN Seshanchalam ignited Narayans
curiosity in literature, the spark actually started catching
fire when he used to spent long-hours in the school library.
Small wonder it was here that he acquainted himself with the
works of Shaw, Belloc, Bennet and Chesterton and developed
a nose for perspicaciousness, and later on cultivated a sense
of critical judgement. It is ironic that being armed with
such a background he could not qualify in his university entrance
examination and that too astonishingly not once but twice
because he failed in English!!
But the truth, however, as one biographer aptly registers
is that Narayan was quintessentially a reclutant pupil prone
to day-dreaming in class and thoroughly at sea at such subjects
as arithmetic. This two-year respite from formal education
allowed him to read, muse, take long walks (miles together
at a time), savour nature and try his hand at writing.
In the meantime, he would write stories and read them to his
friends who were uncritical because he would offer them coffee
and snacks.
Most of his earlier pieces were returned by the editors with
rejection slips, which were cold, callous, impersonal
and sometimes mocking. By then, Narayan not only
knew the hardships a budding writer has to sustain with, but
more cardinally, to be a writer, they are the indispensable
requisites. Not surprisingly, his will to become a fulltime
writer had never wavered, in fact, it was invariably running
through his veins.
|